ROMNEY WORDSWORTH – What happens when a government created transportation monopoly collides with technological innovation?The government moves to crush innovation and protect its monopoly cronies, of course.
Within the jurisdiction of West Windsor, New Jersey, lies the Princeton Junction Train Station, a busy mass transit hub that services Princeton, Princeton University, numerous office parks and corporate campuses along the Route One corridor, and bedroom communities in Plainsboro, East and West Windsor, and other towns whose residents use the train service to commute to New York City.
Servicing this train station is a taxi cab guild.Taxi drivers join the guild by purchasing a Taxi Medallion.These medallions don’t come cheap.They are sold by cities and towns as a means of raising revenue.Recently Jersey City sold 20 such Medallions and raked in $1.5m dollars.A minimum bid is around $50,000.00 and typically rise to $100,000.00 in order to have a winning bid.Once you’ve bought a medallion, you have bought into a State enforced monopoly, and all the perks that go along with it.
As always happens with state created monopolies that are insulated by market forces, the taxi service in Central New Jersey is known for its horrible customer service, the long times taxis take to respond to a call, rude and discourteous drivers, and rampant price gouging.For instance, I have personally heard horror stories from Princeton University students who have described the practice of “stacking”.Taxi drivers in Princeton Junction make them wait until they have a full car, then they take the students to one location at Princeton University (which may not be near where they actually need to go) and, to top it all off, then proceed to charge each student in the car the full fare, as if they had taken a taxi by themselves.I’ve heard this story numerous times, but you won’t see the West Windsor police department write tickets to taxi drivers for this illegal price gouging.Tales of taxi drivers taking unnecessarily long routes are also legion.Many taxi drivers give riders, shall we say, a thoroughly multi-cultural Third World thrill ride, with foreign music blaring from their car speakers and incense soaked air to breathe.
A second story I heard from an elderly Jewish couple described being taken on a half hour taxi ride while the taxi driver spoke Arabic into a phone for the whole trip.Upon exiting the taxi, the Jewish couple was accosted by the driver, who yelled at them:“Death to the Jews!”
Uber would not exist BUT FOR the horrible customer service and high prices of the Taxi Guild Monopoly.Riders have fled in droves to Uber, and to a lesser extent the Uber knock off known as Lyft.Not only are the fares about half or less than what taxi medallions charge, but the app allows Uber to deliver rides within 5 to 15 minutes on average.Ride routes are created by auto navigation that the riders can confirm is direct and efficient.Uber stresses courteous customer service, and it delivers as is evidenced by its popularity.USA Today reported in May of this year that the resale value of Medallions are dropping in major American cities like New York, Chicago, and Philadelphia.In Chicago they have dropped from a high of $357,000.00 in 2013 to “only” $270,000.00 today.Taxi Medallions in New York City have sold for as much as one million dollars in the past, so pressure from Uber, which earned $750m in New York City in its first 4 years of operation, represent a serious asset depreciation for medallion holders.
But now the Taxi Guild Empire is striking back.West Windsor Township is willing to be the Brown Shirts for the Taxi Monopoly, and has started to wage a bare knuckle campaign of ticketing Uber drivers and impounding their cars.Entering the Princeton Junction Train Station drivers are now warned by a giant blinking LED sign:
When Conservatives complain of the regulatory state crushing innovation and killing jobs, this is what we mean.I sure it comes as a surprise to young, tech savvy Millennials that the Democrat politicians that they like to vote for are the same ones who want to take away their Uber, and consign them to being captives of local taxi cab monopolies.
This desperate attempt at erecting a blockade is doomed to fail.Uber is just too agile a service for this sort of thing to work.The Uber app allows drivers to contact riders and arrange for pick ups and drop offs outside of police drag nets.Riders don’t want to take taxi cabs, and State laws and ticketing campaigns won’t force them back into taxi cabs.The Medallion holders might as well be trying to hold back the tide of the Atlantic Ocean.It is also a bit galling that these same towns turn a blind eye to illegal immigrant laborers who gather in their town squares to be hired by contractors and landscapers, but they roll out the power of the State on actual citizens who just want to catch a cheap ride, or make a little extra money.
It is also bad public policy to enact laws that are ignored by a majority of the citizenry.It breeds disrespect for the law in general, and invokes a sense of injustice in the governed.Rather than try to protect old monopolies that the public hates, State and local governments should scrap the old guild systems and embrace innovation.We The People are going to do so anyway, with or without them.
HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson
ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal.
Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle.
Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters.
Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.”
Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with?
After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed.
So, what gives?
Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.”
As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.”
The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt.
Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before.
One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam.
Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed.
Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force.
These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself.
No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results.
So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers.
And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial.
Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you.
EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT.
HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP
“Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance.
Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.”
Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump.
Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon.
“Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.”
Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday.
The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.”
But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why?
At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime.
“The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained:
For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code.
However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct.
A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.”
However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him.
. Obama’s Iran nuke deal
Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server
Obama IRS targets conservatives
Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters
Obamacare & Obama’s false promises
Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order
Operation Fast & Furious
5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl
‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session
Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval
Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law
Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act
Illegally conducting war against Libya
NSA: Spying on Americans
Muslim Brotherhood ties
Solyndra and the lost $535 million
Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress
Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers
Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’