Fundamentally Destroying All America Stood For

I apologize in advance for the length of this essay but there’s just no shorter way of explaining the discovery of Obama’s latest “fundamental transformation of America”

ELDER PATRIOT – Our Founding Fathers risked their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor when they dared to separate from England in a great Revolutionary War.  Their vision was the most honorable reason ever for war and is elucidated in the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be [sacred and undeniable] self evident, that all men are created equal and independent; that from that equal creation they derive in rights inherent and inalienables, among which are the preservation of life, and liberty and the pursuit of happiness…”

George Washington successfully organized the numerous militias of our colonies into a force that defeated the powerful British military.

After the war had been won, a government had to be instituted.  Their first attempt was a failure.  In the spring and summer of 1787 they convened a Constitutional Convention seeking to develop a document that would best protect the individual liberties for which they had risked so much.

Working long hours through the sweltering Philadelphia summer, they gave us our Constitution.  It has proven to be a remarkable document because it provides for balancing the powers of the three legislative branches as well as the powers of the states.  Still, it fell short of protecting the individual liberties that was the justification for the revolution.

Realizing the intrusions on liberty that had occurred in only four short years, the Bill of Rights was presented as the first twelve amendments to the Constitution.  Ten were adopted with the intention of forever safeguarding the individual liberties that so many lives and so much of their fortunes were spent securing.

These honorable men were all successful in their own right.  As successful men they knew that success did not come to everyone.  Some were smarter than others and some worked harder than others to achieve it.  And yes, some were luckier than others.  But, they understood that national policy should not be built on luck.

By protecting the individual’s rights at birth, the Founders sought to provide the freedom for every person to determine his own outcome in life according to his own industriousness.  This is what freedom under honorable men looks like.

There never was intent to equalize outcomes because it was understood that the freedoms of the more industrious would be infringed, and their ability to continue growing their personal fortunes would be diminished retarding the growth of the Nation in the process.

This system worked magnificently for almost 200 years, in the process catapulting the United States to a pre-eminent position in the world in that short time.  It has now been threated by the Progressive Movement’s successful drive for power in determining your rights as a “member of society.”

How did this happen?

The balance of power provided by the Constitution has been compromised with the federal judiciary and the president usurping massive power from the congress and the states.  For this power grab to be successful, those elected to congress, governorships, and state legislatures surrendered their fiduciary obligation to defend their powers for the protection of future generations.

While this transference of power has been occurring for over 75 years it has accelerated past the tipping point since the end of 2008.  Until that time, it had been accomplished through acquiescence and compromise.  With the election of a socialist/Marxist president and a compliant congress in 2008, the United States government has devolved into an autocracy with the rights of the individual being expunged in exchange for some imaginary “societal” benefits.

Obamacare, the president’s signature legislative achievement was ramrodded into law against the people’s approval.  The result is already proving to be the loss of individual rights in choosing your physician and your treatment modalities.  Worse, the treatment modality made available to you will be based on whatever factors the enormous national database programmed to balance the government’s ability to pay against your private personal factors are while, at the same time, weighing the personal private profile of every other individual requiring medical care.  This is a chilling thought in light of past presidents’ use of the IRS against political opponents.

The next pillar of freedom to be destroyed will be accomplished with the completion of an incredibly complex and intense data bases that the Obama administration is building and that has been kept secret until now.  The NY Post is reporting that these databases will be of massive proportions and will maintain every minute personal detail about you and everyone else.  The plan is to be able to use this information to justify legislation and executive orders intended to achieve desired political outcomes.

For the Obama administration it will be used to justify the balancing of racial outcomes.  Already, banks whose portfolios that don’t have enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks whether warranted or not; municipalities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds have had “disparate impact” cases brought against them.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development announced the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing database will be used to racially balance every zip code by pressuring municipalities to comply with their edicts or face the loss of federal funding.  The federal government intends to control local zoning laws by forcing section 8 housing into suburban areas and the relocation of inner city minorities to predominantly white areas.  HUD’s social engineers plan on determining the differences in distance to various amenities – supermarkets, parks, good schools, etc.  If they determine that a municipality is “discriminating” in this way a compliance plan will be developed that must be met or federal funds will be withheld.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has its own database.  It will include, but not be limited to, the compilation of almost two decades of lending data broken down by race, personal credit scores and employment records.  This data will include mortgages, car loans, credit card loans, student loans and virtually anything else tracked by credit bureaus.  Your personal assets and debts, the square footage of your home and the lot size it sits on, as well as the interest rates you are paying are all part of this database that far exceeds that of the IRS.

The FHFA will supply this information to The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB,) Obama’s personal initiative that aggressively investigates lenders for potential racial bias.  Forcing lenders to make loans to minorities despite their financial qualifications was a major factor behind the 2008 economic meltdown.

The CFPB is also populating it’s own database monitoring every aspect of your credit card transactions.  The Obama plan is to determine disparities in interest rates, charge-offs, and collections by racial designations.  Wouldn’t this all be unnecessary if no one was permitted to ask for an applicant’s race?

The CFPB has yet another racially sensitive database that will supply reporting to the Office of Minority and Women Inclusion as a means for forcing further diversity on banks and Wall Street.

The Department of Education is building a database that will end home-rule of our school districts by turning them into federal compliance centers.  Suspensions and expulsions are being tracked by race.  Districts that have disparities by race will be forced to adopt reforms or be punished.  This is already happening with classroom violence the result.

Programs designed to advance our smartest and brightest students quickly are being assessed for racial composition.  Soon, your child’s acceptance in a gifted and talented, or an advanced placement class will mean little.  Failure to comply will be referred to the Civil Rights Office.  Lawyers are already lining up to bring lawsuits. At least to me this raises the question, if the education system is overwhelmingly populated by progressives how is it also racist?

This massive compilation of data is contrary to every concept of freedom that our Founders sacrificed so much to attain and worked so hard to pass on to us.  Beyond its illegality it will be used by different administrations for different purposes as meets their political ends.

For this racially obsessed president it will be used to backdoor reparations against the will of the people and against the national interest.

The Constitution’s guarantee of our right to privacy is sacrosanct.  It’s so absolute that the Supreme Court relied on it to underpin its decision to legalize abortion.  The fact that Obama is sidestepping this most fundamental right in his convoluted advocacy of social justice should sicken everyone who believes in the right of privacy and the principle of owning the rewards of their hard work.

For Congress to borrow your children’s money fund this is unconscionable.

For all of you who voted for the fundamental transformation the United States of America, you have only yourself to blame.  Not only have you voted for your tax dollars to fund programs that are against your self-interest, you have committed your children’s tax dollars to fund programs that will be against their self-interest.  Congress may have abandoned their responsibility in this matter.  I won’t.  I ask my fellow constitutionalists to join me in never stopping reminding Obama voters what they have wrought on America.

HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal. Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle. Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters. Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.” Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with? After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed. So, what gives? Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.” As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.” The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt. Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed. Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force. These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself. No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results. So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers. And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial. Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you. EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT. HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’