Finally Jews Tell Obama to Go to Hell…

ELDER PATRIOT – The most racially divisive president of the past one hundred years has finally been recognized as the most religiously divisive president in the history of America, as well.

Whether President Obama is secretly Muslim or not will be left for future historians to argue about.  But, what is undeniable has been Obama’s policies promoting and protecting Islam at every opportunity while belittling and marginalizing Christians for their belief in God.

Over the course of his eight years in office he was more careful not to alienate the American Jewish community because they are reliably Democrat voters and they contribute money to the Democratic Party – lots and lots of money.  But, there were indications of his hostility towards Israel that began with forcing Prime Minister Netanyahu, who was on an official state visit, to enter the White House through a rear door and then making him wait while Obama ate dinner with his wife and children.

Now that Obama is free of any personal political reliance on Jewish Americans he threw Israel under the bus by organizing and then refusing to veto a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements on the West Bank.  The West Bank had previously been under Jordanian control and had been used by Palestinian guerillas to stage terrorist attacks in Israel under direction from Egypt and Syria.

Jordan’s King Hussein viewed the PLO, due to their alignment with the more virulently military anti-Israel Arab nations, as a threat to his power and he feared that the PLO might try to depose him or launch attacks directly on Israel with help from other more aggressive Arab nations that he would be blamed for.

Forced into a corner the Jordanian king aligned with the other Arab nations allowing Egypt’s announcement that:

“The armies of Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon are poised on the borders of Israel…to face the challenge, while standing behind us are the armies of Iraq, Algeria, Kuwait, Sudan and the whole Arab nation. This act will astound the world. Today they will know that the Arabs are arranged for battle, the critical hour has arrived. We have reached the stage of serious action and not declarations.”

Israel, a nation slightly smaller than New Jersey at the time, launched a pre-emptive attack after its generals concluded it would be impossible to defend itself if the enemy was allowed to strike first.

Six days later the war was over.  Israel had seized control of land areas that more than tripled its previous size.  This included the West Bank an area of a little under 2,200 square miles but of immense strategic importance to the tiny nation.

The moderate King Hussein of Jordan had been caught in a war he wanted no part of advancing a terrorist organization (PLO) that he’d prefer to see gone so he willingly ceded the land to Israel renouncing all claim to the area as part of the peace terms.

This is what Obama is intent on reversing.  If the U.N. were to be successful it would turn the Jewish Holy Land and Jerusalem over to the Palestinian Authority that has no historical claims to the land except those imagined by those opposed to Israel’s existence in its entirety.

Obama has departed from previous presidents who, despite exhaustive attempts to broker a lasting peace between the PLO and Israel, realized that there was only one entity willing to actually negotiate at the table – Israel.  The PLO, a tiny organization weaponized by massive infusions of our petro dollars, as well as arms from hostile Arab nations, has steadfastly refused to accept or negotiate on any of the peace terms the Israelis have offered.

Their recalcitrance became so transparent that Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu once remarked, “The truth is that if Israel were to put down its arms there would be no more Israel.  If the Arabs were to put down their arms there would be no more war.”

Instead of acknowledging the PLO’s intransigence Obama has taken the side of Arab hardliners that are determined to destroy the tiny nation state by laying the foundation for an economic war on Israel through a global movement to boycott Israeli products, divest of investments in Israeli companies and companies that do business with Israel, and that would put other economic sanctions on the Middle East’s only democratic nation.

This latest action by Obama has finally awakened the Jewish people in America to the fact that Obama is not their friend.  This was driven home last night when Rabbi Levi Shemtov, handpicked by the Obama administration to light the National Hanukkah Menorah, refused to remain silent any longer and turned on the president saying that because of Obama’s acquiescence to the demands of radical extremists we “are working in a place where there is great grief and darkness…we look forward to the day when there will be no more darkness, there will be no more evil, there will be no more disappointment.”

Obama’s war on religion – other than Islam –was driven home by reports from Aleppo that now that Syrian forces – forces that Obama had opposed – had regained control of the city war-weary Christians were able to celebrate a Christmas Mass amid the ruins of the bombed-out St. Elias Cathedral.

Obama may have wanted to bridge the cultural divide between Islam and our Judeo-Christian culture but the end result of his actions is a world so divided along conflicting religious ideologies that governments are now resorting to banning free speech to quell the growing insurrection.

Whatever his intentions might have been Obama must be held accountable for a nation divided along racial lines and a world divided along religious lines.

HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal. Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle. Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters. Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.” Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with? After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed. So, what gives? Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.” As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.” The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt. Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed. Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force. These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself. No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results. So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers. And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial. Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you. EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT. HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’