ROMNEY WORDSWORTH – In France, Marine Le Pen, leader of National Front party, is being put on trial this month for a statement she said back in 2010.  In the last presidential election France, the National Front party garnered 17.9% of the first round voting.   Her crime?  She said the following during a public speech:

“I’m sorry, but for those who really like to talk about World War II, if we’re talking about an occupation, we could talk about the [Muslim] street prayers,

because that is clearly an occupation of territory.

It is an occupation of sections of the territory, of neighborhoods in which

in which religious law applies—it is an occupation.  There are no tanks, there

are no soldiers, but it is an occupation nevertheless, and it weighs on people.”

To get an idea of what Ms. Le Pen was talking about, a picture is worth 1,000 words:street-prayer

Muslims routinely fill up and occupy streets, lots of them, blocking traffic, ostensibly for prayers.  It is a none too subtle tactic that says that Islam intends to conquer France.  This psychological assault on native French was so bad, that the following year, in 2011, the Paris city government imposed a ban on the practice.  Muslims have continued to occupy Paris streets for prayer anyway.  The above picture was taken in 2013.  In this context, Le Pen’s comments seem down right reserved, and justified.  So Marine Le Pen was right, n’est-ce pas?  Not exactly.  She’s being put on trial five years after the fact anyway. 

After the initial investigation into Le Pen’s comments was closed in 2011, the case was reopened in 2012 following a legal complaint by an immigrant rights group. She was then put under formal investigation in July 2014, after immunity granted her as a member of the European Parliament was removed following a vote requested by French authorities in 2013.  So, just let that settle in your mind for a moment:  Marine Le Pen had legal immunity from prosecution for this sort of thing, as a sitting member of the European Parliament.  It was removed from her, retroactively!  The Socialist government of Francois Hollande is charging her with “inciting racial hatred”.  You may be surprised to learn that Islam has suddenly become a “race”, but never mind.  The point is to use criminal prosecutions to suppress viewpoints that those in power don’t agree with.  If convicted, Ms. Le Pen faces a year in prison and a fine of 45,000 euros. 

In Ireland, a sports bookmaker is being fined for an indirect joke about immigration.  Irish bookmaker Paddy Power put out the following advertising poster:


The advertisement makes an oblique reference to the fact that Moroccan illegal immigrants are jumping onto trucks entering the Chunnel from the Calais, France side in such gigantic numbers, British authorities have had to close down the channel tunnel.  The immigrants are determined to get to the U.K. for the superior welfare payments.  But don’t you dare criticize this invasion of Europe, in even the most veiled terms.  The Irish Advertising Standards Authority has issued a ruling that the advertisement violates Ireland’s advertising code on the following grounds:  Advertising campaigns must not cause general offence (emphasis added).  Advertising campaigns must avoid offense on grounds including race.  A third ground references “sensitivity regarding diversity”. 

Paddy Power maintains it tries to be edgy and humorous in its advertising and meant no offence.  That, of course, is not the standard of review imposed by the New Totalitarians.  It is irrelevant what YOU intend, only if the subjective feelings of the listener or reader of your words are hurt.

What is going on in Ireland is kid stuff compared to what is going on in Germany.  Germans are now being threatened by the State with having their children removed from their custody if they criticize the government of Angela Merkel for taking in millions of hostile Muslim “refugees”.  Even the mildest objections to the new immigrants’ penchant for gang raping local girls can get you branded a “xenophobe”.  Apparently, if you as a German citizen are not totally thrilled with the notion of millions of Muslims coming to your country with the avowed purpose of “breeding Germans out of existence”, Muslim rape gangs so prevalent that German authorities are telling school girls not to risk wearing short skirts, and your government sticking German taxpayers with the bill, that makes you a “xenophobe”.   Merkel’s immigration policies are wildly unpopular and the answer of the Merkel Regime to this political dissent is to threaten to steal people’s children.  Don’t be surprised:  Angela Merkel was a Communist Activist in her youth.

The German public was put on notice of the authorities intolerance to anyone failing to welcome the Muslim hordes with open arms via Eva Becker, Chairwoman of the Working Group on Family Law of the German Bar Association.  In an article titled “Racism and parenting:  Threatening loss of custody?” the German Bar Association outlines conditions under which “xenophobic” comments made on Facebook could lead to parents being targeted with actions by the State to remove their children from their custody.

The article advises that expressing a desire for violence against Muslim migrants would constitute evidence enough for a family court to remove children from the home.  No exceptions granted to aggrieved parents whose daughters have been raped by Muslim rape gangs.

Joining in the tyranny against free thought was Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who was caught on a hot mike discussing plans with Angela Merkel to censor Facebook posts that were anti-immigrant, and report them to German authorities.  Those found guilty of “refugee baiting” remarks will be hit with 5000 euro fines and/or 120 days in jail.  Meanwhile the Merkel government is hiring ex-Stasi intelligence officers to monitor remarks made on the internet.  So, congratulations, all you East Germans who thought you escaped communist East Germany.  IT’S BAAAACK!

The totalitarian dragnet on freedom of expression has even come back to scoop up  Leftists themselves.  In the United Kingdom, a woman by the name of Bahar Mustafa, Diversity Officer of Goldsmiths, University of London, is being hauled before a criminal Magistrates Court this November 5th.  Her crime?  She held a student event for ethnic minority women and specifically disinvited White Men from attending. 

Mustafa has asserted in her defense that as a minority woman, she is incapable of being racist or sexist.  Unfortunately for her, the laws on the books that the Leftists had enacted provides for no such exception.  She is charged with “conveying a threatening message” and for “sending a grossly offensive message via a public communication network”.  I’ll let the readers be the judge.  Here is the offending message:


As much as I enjoy the schadenfreude of seeing this man-hating fascist troll hoisted upon her own petard, I object to the underlying notion that we are not at liberty to enjoy freedom of association.  But, we have nit wits like this to thank for the current state of affairs.  No male tears being shed here. 

But how about here in the United States?  Today it was reported by Infowars.com that in Gonzales, Texas, a man was handcuffed and arrested after exceeding his allotted three minute limit to speak before the local town council.  He was objecting to the Federal takeover of the Gonzales Police Department at the time of his arrest. 

Got that, America, Land of the Free and Home of the Brave?  Go over your 3 minute time to speak, and it’s off to jail with you…serf!  Know your place before your overlords.

The evidence is everywhere, and impossible to deny.  Tyranny is on the rise in country after country.  Western legal traditions of Freedom of Expression are being stomped out of existence.

HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal. Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle. Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters. Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.” Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with? After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed. So, what gives? Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.” As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.” The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt. Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed. Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force. These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself. No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results. So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers. And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial. Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you. EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT. HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’