Attack of the Obama Clones – The Phantom Menace

ROMNEY WORDSWORTH – Executions of police officers is on the rise.  According to the Officer Down Memorial Page website, there have been 83 deaths of Law Enforcement Officers in 2015.  In the month of August alone, there were 14 deaths, nearly one every two days.  Twenty-four of this yearly total have been executions by gunfire.  The month of August saw a gruesome execution spree where several officers were gunned down in disparate parts of the country, from Fox Lake, Illinois, to Harris County, Texas, to Bell City and Shreveport, Louisiana, to Memphis, Tennessee.  July saw a cop shot execution style in California, and June saw the same thing happen in New York City.

Is there a connection between all these shootings?  I believe there are two common threads connecting these murders.  The first is George Soros.  George Soros has spent millions funding the Black Lives Matter movement, as well as rioters in Ferguson, MO.  The tipoff that professional provocateurs had been sent in to Ferguson was when some of them complained publically about not getting paid.  Now, maybe this sounds like a conspiracy theory to you, and maybe this sounds too incredible to believe.  But it is actually mainstream news reported on by the Washington Post back on January 14, 2015 by reporter Kelly Ridell.  As reported in the Washington Post, George Soros has funded the Ferguson Rioters to the tune of $33 million through his nonprofit Open Society Foundations, Moveon.org, and dozens of other front groups.  There is every reason to believe that the riots in Baltimore this summer was similarly “guided” by professional, paid agitators.

Now we have #blacklivesmatter organizing marches and chanting slogans about bringing about a race war in this country, and targeting cops and whites for murder.  Charming little ditties like:  “Pigs in a blanket, Fry ‘em like bacon!” and “What do we want?  DEAD COPS!  When do we want it?  NOW!”

So, thread #1 is a well funded street agitation movement, specifically targeting cops with murder.  Thread #2 is the changing conduct of the police themselves.  There has been a sea change in police training, and how the police view themselves in the community.  This view has changed from being Officers of the Peace to being a combination of being a local Army of Occupation, and being the Tax Collectors of Government.

Police have used speed traps to generate revenue for decades. That’s nothing new, but there are factors creating a new dynamic. One, police are now being trained to use more brutal tactics in dealing with the public. It’s a “Taser First, Ask Questions Later” mentality. Except sometimes they use bullets, not tasers.  Sometimes, they infamously use flash bang grenades thrown into baby cribs.  Another example of the new, more brutal policing model, police now routinely shoot the dogs of citizens any time they have to go on to private property. If your dog so much as makes one bark, police are now trained to shoot your dog as a first resort, regardless of why they are on your property.  Police are now being trained to draw a weapon (a Taser, Pepper Spray, or even a firearm) as a First Response to any resistance to police commands, whether real or perceived.  Asking questions, or pointing out the unconstitutionality of an order, is considered resisting arrest or obstruction of police business.  Police routinely across the country order citizens to stop filming them during a traffic stop or an arrest situation, even though the Supreme Court has ruled unequivocally, more than once, that such orders are unconstitutional and that citizens have an absolute right to film.  If you go do a google search, there is a new video showing police brutality on citizens every week. One of the most common is body slamming citizens who are already handcuffed, with their hands behind their backs, kicking out their feet and making sure they hit the pavement or floor face first. This is being done even with women in police custody. Again, that doesn’t just happen.  When it keeps happening over and over, it means Police learn to do that in training, and that is the new police academy curriculum. 

Community-Police relations have grown sour precisely in sync with police militarization. Police now roll heavier than combat troops in Afghanistan, not just in terms of body armor and firepower, but they are also rolling in MRAPS.  The use of SWAT teams has exploded exponentially.  According to The WEEK news magazine, from January 19, 2015, the number of SWAT raids nationwide has grown from 3,000 in 1980 to 80,000 a year today.  SWAT teams are being used to serve warrants for misdemeanors, to take down an optometrist guilty of making bets on football games, and to raid a house raising chickens contrary to local ordinance (the chickens all being dispatched with lethal force).  Not that anyone in government these days thinks much about destroying or seizing your property before a due process hearing, of course.   Then there is the story reported on by KUSA Television in Colorado this week about how a Deputy Sheriff wrote a ticket for a cracked windshield and gave it to a motorist…while he was in the parking lot of a glass repair shop and was waiting his turn to drive his vehicle into the garage to have it replaced.  Confirmation by the repair garage was to no avail:  The Sheriff had found a Serf to shakedown and add to the coffers of Prince John, er, the local town council, and appeals to reason or compassion were futile. 

All that militarization seeps into policing mentality. If you view the community as an enemy, if your police department acts like they are occupying Fallujah, they will create Fallujah.  A blind man could have seen that growing police brutality would produce the blow back that we are seeing now: Citizens assassinating cops in retaliation.  If police mottos have morphed from “To Protect & Serve” into “To Prey Upon & Surveil”, somebody ordered them to do so. And that somebody is your own local Mayor or Town Council. I imagine cops don’t like ticket quotas any more than we do, but if they are treating your community as just so many marks to shake down for more money, the people setting those quotas are the people you are voting for. We have to start making this a campaign issue and a litmus test for those running for local office. Otherwise, the wolves will continue to prey upon the sheeple.

I am not saying that police brutality justifies execution of cops.  I am saying that police brutality will not command the hearts and minds of the people, and may explain why calls for attacks on police are resonating with such a large segment of the population.  This is not an accident.  The Regime run by Obama that has George Soros funding and agitating for a Race War in this country is the same Regime that runs the Federal government, and the DHS program that is showering local law enforcement with armored vehicles, automatic weapons, and military style training.  A conflict is being engineered from the top, and from the bottom.  The strategy is called “Bottom Up, Top Down, Inside Out”, and if that sounds familiar, it is because this is what Van Jones (the White House aide who was forced out of his position in 2008 when his ties to radical communism became publicized) was famous for saying repeatedly.  This plan is being implemented today, and Barack Obama is like Emperor Palpatine, secretly directing the troops of the Separatists from the shadows while building up a new domestic clone army, and turning the Republic into an Evil Empire.  Police receiving militarized training, and inner city blacks receiving militarized rhetoric are both being used as pawns for a more sinister purpose:  The stripping away of our liberties and the institution of a Police State. 

HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal. Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle. Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters. Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.” Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with? After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed. So, what gives? Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.” As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.” The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt. Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed. Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force. These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself. No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results. So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers. And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial. Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you. EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT. HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’