Both of These American Women Were Murdered… But the Media Only Told Us About One

Kirsters Baish| After the attack in Charlottesville, Virginia this past Saturday, the media has been in a frenzy to condemn White Supremacists and play the blame game. Heather Heyer, the woman who lost her life when a Nazi-sympathizer rammed his car into a rally of counter-protesters, has been in the news every day since authorities released her name to the public. The media has been sure to place complete blame on the White Supremacists who caused so much grief, but another woman was killed, and no one said anything.

Allen B. West reported:

Greetings from Jackson, Mississippi. I’m here doing several media interviews and to speak at the Roaring Lambs of Jackson monthly luncheon today. Yesterday I had a short break between media and was in my hotel room and caught some of the memorial service for 32-year-old Heather Heyer, who was tragically killed by a white supremacist. There is no explanation for her death, and sadly her life was cut short by the embodiment of hate. There has been much attention given to Heather’s death, as well there should be. She was an innocent young woman who was doing what she felt compelled to do making a stand, and she paid the price for it with her life. 

We can understand when troops lose their lives in combat standing up for principles and values they’ve sworn to defend. It’s very hard to accept the death of someone like Heather Heyer, and there are many complicit hands beyond the dark evil behind the wheel of the car.

But, as I watched the coverage of Ms. Heyer’s memorial I pondered the tragic death of another young American woman, Kate Steinle. For whatever reason — and I know why — there was not the same amount of coverage or national sympathy that went out for Kate Steinle.

As a matter of fact, I recall then-Secretary of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson, being asked about Ms. Steinle’s death before a Congressional hearing…his response was “who?”

And perhaps, as I am writing this, there are those of you who shamefully shifted over to a Google search on Kate Steinle. Let me remind you, she was a young American woman out for a walk with her dad in San Francisco who was gunned down by a criminal illegal alien. Kate Steinle died in her dad’s arms, her life tragically taken away as she was enjoying a peaceful time with her family. There was no cause or protest surrounding her fateful murder. She fell victim not just to the bullet that caused her death, but a policy, and ideological agenda that enabled her death.

If there’s one thing I despise, it’s hypocrisy. And I ask the rhetorical question, why was Kate Steinle’s murder and her memorial service not covered as a national tragedy? We know why. Because for the progressive socialist left, their ideological agenda is more important than anything…to include the death of a young American woman.

While the left preaches acceptance of all, and demand condemnation for the White Supremacists who are responsible for Heather Heyer’s death, they said nothing when an illegal alien killed an American citizen in cold blood. Where were the rallies for Kate Steinle following her death? Where was the media when she was brutally attacked for no good reason by some illegal thug?
The family of Kate Steinle spoke out against the Liberal idea of sanctuary cities. The Left is now demanding that we begin to erase our country’s history, starting with the destruction of Confederate monuments all over the country. What’s really sad about this is that too many Americans don’t even know enough about the history of our country to make the judgements that they are continuing to make.
The progressives in our country are blind to their own stupidity and hypocrisy, and it’s becoming dangerous. Heyer’s death is being publicized and she is being crowned as a hero who died for the cause that she was fighting for, but someone like Steinle who was simply an innocent victim who was talking a walk with her father, is still unknown to many Americans. When will the left see that their idea of sanctuary cities is completely ludicrous? Are we really willing to risk American lives in order to help illegal immigrants, many of which are criminals anyway?
How many police officers do we have to lose to anti-police violence from the Black Lives Matter movement and from illegal aliens? What these White Supremacists did was unjustifiable, but that doesn’t make illegal aliens who commit brutal crimes any less guilty. Where is the Left’s outrage for the crime being committed by these illegals?
Allen B. West went on to explain:

Heck, why did the left so viciously attack the mother of Sean Smith, Pat Smith — remember, the State Department IT specialist killed in Benghazi? Has anyone ever seen a picture of the wife of former Navy SEAL Ty Woods, or his little son who will never know his heroic dad? I met them both at the US Navy SEAL Museum in Ft. Pierce Florida. Nah, they just don’t matter, they weren’t relevant because their deaths weren’t part of the left’s ideological agenda or their message. And the left, allied by a complicit media, found it very easy to dismiss — no, lie — about their deaths, along with Glenn Doherty, in that far away place called Benghazi.

While it is a true tragedy that Heather Heyer lost her life fighting for what she believed was right, her death proves that the Left only acknowledges crime that furthers their agenda. This is exactly why Steinle’s death was ignored by the media. So, while the media continues to demand condemnation for the White Supremacists groups in our country, we will continue to demand condemnation for extremist groups and illegal immigrants who are killing whites in our country.

HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal. Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle. Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters. Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.” Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with? After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed. So, what gives? Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.” As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.” The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt. Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed. Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force. These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself. No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results. So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers. And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial. Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you. EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT. HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’