ROMNEY WORDSWORTH – Last night the Republican Presidential Primary field of candidates held their third debate in Boulder, Colorado.  The debate was “moderated” by CNBC with an all star team of Democrat Party hacks, character assassins, and outright liars.  These were Carl Quintanilla, Becky Quick and John Harwood, who were both continually booed by the audience and castigated by the candidates for asking the most unfair, inane, and insulting questions of all time.

A paraphrased sampling of some of the most obnoxious questions:

To All Candidates:  What is your biggest weakness?  (in other words, tell us in your own words why you are unfit to be President)

To Donald Trump:  Aren’t you just running a comic book version of a presidential campaign?

To Ben Carson:  I (John Harwood) can’t make the math add up on your tax plan.

To Carly Fiorina:  The Hewlit-Packard Board of Directors fired you.  I just wondered why you think we should hire you now?

To Marco Rubio:  You have a lack of bookkeeping skills. You accidentally inter-mingled campaign money with your personal money. You faced foreclosure on a second home that you bought. And just last year, you liquidated a $68,000 retirement fund. That’s something that cost you thousands of dollars in taxes and penalties.

In terms of all of that, it raises the question whether you have the maturity and wisdom to lead this $17 trillion economy. What do you say?

To Carly Fiorina:  You want to reduce the tax code from 70,000 pages to 3.  Is that using really small type?

To Marco Rubio:  Do you hate your job?

To Ted Cruz:  Does your opposition to raising the debt limit show that you’re not the kind of problem-solver American voters want?

To Ben Carson:  Why would you serve on a company whose policies seem to run counter to your views on homosexuality?

In a refreshing change of pace, the candidates for the most part didn’t just take the abusive tone of the questions without firing back.  Ted Cruz started the counter-attack:

CRUZ: You know, let me say something at the outset. The questions that have been asked so far in this debate illustrate why the American people don’t trust the media.

(APPLAUSE) This is not a cage match. And, you look at the questions — “Donald Trump, are you a comic-book villain?” “Ben Carson, can you do math?” “John Kasich, will you insult two people over here?” “Marco Rubio, why don’t you resign?” “Jeb Bush, why have your numbers fallen?”

How about talking about the substantive issues the people care about?

CRUZ: The contrast with the Democratic debate, where every fawning question from the media was, “Which of you is more handsome and why?”

CRUZ: Let me be clear. The men and women on this stage have more ideas, more experience, more common sense than every participant in the Democratic debate. That debate reflected a debate between the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks.


Other candidates then struck back as well:

CHRISTIE: What we should do is to be investing in all types of energy, John, all types of energy. I’ve laid out…

HARWOOD: You mean government?

CHRISTIE: No, John. John, do you want me to answer or do you want to answer?


How are we going to do this?


Because, I’ve got to tell you the truth, even in New Jersey what you’re doing is called rude. So…


CNBC set out to make a political snuff film, with the goal of taking out each and every Republican candidate on behalf of the Hillary Clinton campaign.  Overall, their strategy seemed to be to starve Donald Trump and Ben Carson of air-time, a tacit recognition that their past attacks on both candidates only helped them.  On the other hand, the CNBC panel has learned nothing, since they last night made repeated futile attacks on Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, only succeeding in elevating them and making them look good.  Rand Paul was also ignored, as liberal standard operating procedure, to never give a genuine fiscal conservative any airtime.

Instead, the panel lavished John Kasich with the most air time (at least it seemed that way to me watching the debate).  Kasich is the Poster Boy for Blanket Amnesty and an expansion of programs like Medicaid.  He is polling at 0% with Republican Primary voters, so of course the Leftists at CNBC showered him with love. 

Let’s get to the scoring now:

THE BIGGEST LOSER:  Besides the profession of journalism, the biggest losing candidate was Jeb Bush.  No energy, not much air time, and Bush keeps repeating the same mistakes.  In an election cycle where the electorate is mistrustful and downright hostile to the Political Establishment, Jeb Bush keeps touting his record as governor, reminding everyone that he is a member not only of the Washington Establishment, but one of its ruling dynastic families.  Bush was the only one to resonate with the Moderators, joining their attack on Rubio for missing some votes while running for President.  It was particularly politically tone deaf for Bush to do this, in front of an audience openly booing the Moderators.   

The Jebbernought has broken its keel on the rocky shoals of voter anti-establishment mood.  The engine room is flooded, the Donor Class is abandoning ship.  Do not be surprised if Jeb withdraws before the first ballots are cast.

THE BIGGEST WINNER:   Drudge and CNBC polls immediately after the debate had Trump as the winner, and while he did not do badly, I would say Ted Cruz was the winner for the best lines, and best exposure, with Marco Rubio a close second.  Expect both to see a bounce in their poll numbers post-debate.

THE BIGGEST SURPRISE:  The biggest surprise of the night, for me, was Mike Huckabee endorsing Donald Trump for President.  I’m not sure what cabinet position Huckabee is auditioning for in a Trump Administration, but his unreserved praise of Trump as a candidate who would make a great president made the biggest impression on me.  So much for the media narrative of Trump as a clown, or a comic book villain.

FADING FAST:  If it were possible, John Kasich would go into negative numbers after rubbing primary voters noses in his big statist vision of government.  Carly Fiorina and Rand Paul just failed to stand out in the crowd.  While Chris Christie had some great lines, and does well on the debate stage, it is hard to overlook that he is running as the Authoritarian Police State candidate.  I expect Christie to hang on until New Hampshire, where he has put all his chips on the table.  After that it will be a quick exit back to Trenton.

MISS CONGENIALITY:  Mike Huckabee always strikes the most conciliatory, and least combative tone, toward the other candidates.

TREADING WATER:  I have to give this one to Ben Carson.  I don’t think he got much air time.  While he deftly deflected the attacks of the Moderators, his lines were not memorable.  If you already like him as a candidate, then he did nothing to lose your vote.  If you already prefer another candidate, he probably said nothing to gain your vote.

MOST DISHONEST MOMENT:  John Harwood trying to deny that Donald Trump had forced CNBC to shorten the debate from 3 hours to 2.  It was widely reported in the press.  Harwood’s willingness to tell such a blatant lie on air just to try to deny letting Donald Trump take credit for showing strong negotiating skills was truly appalling.

In the greatest irony of the evening, Reince Preibus was tweeting his disgust at the biased moderating of CNBC.  Well, Reince, YOU were the dummy who threw the Republican candidates to these wolves.  Time to try something else.

HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal. Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle. Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters. Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.” Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with? After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed. So, what gives? Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.” As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.” The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt. Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed. Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force. These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself. No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results. So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers. And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial. Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you. EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT. HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’