1984: ‘OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD’ RAMPED BACK UP As CIA Uses WASHINGTON POST To Plant FAKE NEWS About … ‘FAKE NEWS’

ELDER PATRIOT – Operation Mockingbird was a campaign by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to influence media during the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. Begun in the 1950s, it was initially organized by Cord Meyer and Allen W. Dulles, and was later led by Frank Wisner after Dulles became the head of the CIA. The organization recruited leading American journalists into a propaganda network to help present the CIA’s views. It funded some student and cultural organizations and magazines as fronts. As it developed, it also worked to influence foreign media and political campaigns, in addition to activities by other operating units of the CIA.




In 1975 Idaho Senator Frank Church chaired the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities to better understand how pervasive into the lives everyday Americans our intelligence agencies had become.

On August 17, 1975 Senator Frank Church appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, and discussed the NSA, without mentioning it by name:

“In the need to develop a capacity to know what potential enemies are doing, the United States government has perfected a technological capability that enables us to monitor the messages that go through the air. (…) Now, that is necessary and important to the United States as we look abroad at enemies or potential enemies. We must know, at the same time, that capability at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left such is the capability to monitor everything—telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide.

If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know. Such is the capability of this technology. (…)

I don’t want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return”

The CIA has operated without limits as President Kennedy learned when it launched a covert invasion of Cuba without the president’s knowledge or consent.  When Kennedy learned of the invasion he refused to order the necessary air cover as the CIA presumed he would.  Kennedy was forever wary of the CIA and the control that the Globalists exercised over it.  It’s the likely reason that Kennedy was assassinated.

That’s why the Washington Post’s recent headline “Secret CIA assessment says Russia

was trying to help Trump win White House” lacks even a shred of believability.




The Washington Post doesn’t cite a single source for their allegations that, “The CIA has concluded a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system.”

The WaPo allegations continued, “Intelligence agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided Wikileaks with thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others, including Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, according to the U.S. official.  Those officials described the individuals as actors known to the intelligence community and part of a wider Russian operation to boost Trump and hurt Clinton’s chances.”

Buried near the end of the article is an acknowledgement that the Republican National Committee was also hacked by the same actors.

So what can we conclude from this report if it’s true?

First, the CIA also wanted Donald Trump to become our next president.  How else can its silence during the campaign be explained?  Please don’t suggest that the most highly funded and extensive intelligence agency in the world didn’t know what was going on with our nation’s cyber networks until this past week.  Especially in light of the fact that those they accuse of being involved were already known to the CIA!

Second, how could Secretary of State Hillary Clinton – fourth in line to the presidency and the former “co-president” – not have understood the cyber security threat that the Russians posed when she chose to use an unsecured private server from which to send and receive official and highly sensitive emails?

Third, how is President Obama after eight years as Commander in Chief only now becoming aware that our enemies have the same spy technologies that we have and are constantly hacking government computers for any information that they can glean?

Fourth, the Washington Post took care to absolve the recent undermining of our electoral process by rioters, elector dissent, claims that the Electoral College no longer serves the voters’ interests, recounts, et al as resulting from Russian interference.  After all, that has to look like organically generated disgust by Americans.

If the article is true we are also forced to conclude that both Clinton and Obama were treasonously derelict in their duties to protect America’s national security interests.

It’s most likely that the lack of source material for the allegations or the name of even the name of a single spokesperson means the story is just another piece of propaganda from the Washington Post and the CIA intended to begin a propaganda campaign aimed at discrediting Donald Trump and to help prop up a badly damaged Democratic Party in an attempt to restore credibility to the Left-Right paradigm that has been used effectively in the past to keep the masses distracted while the CIA secretly advances their stealth agenda without notoriety.